In search of solitude, the Original Poster (OP) and her husband purchased a sprawling property bordering a national park, enchanted by its permanent creeks and serene swimming holes. However, a well-trodden path on their land leading to a popular swimming spot quickly became a source of contention. As they erected barriers to protect their privacy, tensions with the local community reached a boiling point.
A Dream Away from the City
OP and her husband began their search for a retreat from urban life. They had simple desires: a house for OP and permanent running water for her husband. After many viewings, they found a perfect property purely by chance.
The Perfect Find
The property they discovered boasted two permanent creeks and a small, cozy house. It sat adjacent to a national park, promising eternal seclusion. It was larger than they anticipated at almost 100 acres and was the last house on its dirt road.
An Old Owner’s Tale
The property was previously owned by an elderly man who occasionally visited it on weekends and to hold extended family gatherings. His primary residence was in the city, making the property relatively unused.
The Attraction of Creeks
The creeks were undeniably attractive features of the property. Full of swimming holes, they were particularly inviting. One hole even had a rope tied to a tree, hinting at the adventures of local kids.
The Path of Contention
A well-trodden path led to the most popular swimming hole, located between the property and the national park entrance. Over time, locals had come to know and love this swimming spot, frequently traversing the path on OP’s property.
Concerned about privacy, OP’s husband decided to erect a wire fence across the path, marking their private territory with a “no trespassing” sign. They wished for the privacy they had paid for while still allowing others to enjoy the swimming hole from the national park side.
A Visit of Discontent
Only days after the fence went up, a woman came around to confront them. She claimed to have walked the path and swum in the creek for decades. They explained their position, emphasizing the importance of their privacy.
A Town Divided
The fence soon became the talk of the local suburb, thanks to a post on Facebook complaining about it. Reactions were mixed: some understood OP’s concerns, while others were upset about the sudden barrier.
Despite their clear communication, someone cut the wire fence and stole their sign within a week, showcasing the neighborhood’s feelings about the new rules. It was evident that not everyone respected their wishes for privacy.
An Invasion of Space
One day, while OP was mowing the lawn, three girls brazenly walked across the property. They emerged from the very path OP had hoped to secure, casually strolling across the front yard as if it were public land.
Though they had sought solitude in the countryside, OP and her husband found that their rural property attracted more intruders than their city-dwelling ever had. Despite their attempts at setting boundaries, OP and her husband felt they were constantly challenged.
A Question of Ownership
OP and her husband weren’t trying to claim the water or deny its enjoyment to others. They simply wanted people to access the swimming hole from the national park side, respecting their private land boundaries.
A Plea for Privacy
While many locals had used the swimming hole for years, OP and her husband yearned for the privacy they believed they were entitled to. They hoped their neighbors would come to understand and respect their wishes.
Recollections of an Elderly Seller
The previous owner’s passive use of the property had made it an open space for locals. His frequent absences had allowed the community to freely enjoy the swimming hole without any restrictions.
Evaluating Urban vs. Rural
While they had envisioned a peaceful life away from the hustle and bustle, OP and her husband were confronted with unexpected challenges. The quiet countryside brought its own set of intrusions.
The Heart of the Matter
At the core, the issue was about boundaries, respect, and the delicate balance between community enjoyment and personal privacy. OP grappled with whether her actions were justified or if she was indeed in the wrong.
Was The Woman’s Behavior Appropriate?
OP posts her story online for feedback and perspective from the internet community. The readers in the forum had a lot of mixed views on the matter.
One reader said, “Letting people access the water from your property also would probably be a liability for you if something bad were to happen. It is on your property, and you are within your right to prevent access.”
Another Commenter Thinks
Another responder wrote, “Alternatively, you could try to sell or donate an easement or slice of your property to the park. Don’t overlook donating since you can claim it on your taxes AND be generous towards the community.”
A Third View on The Story
A different person stated, “You’re entitled to protect your own privacy, and I’d also recommend getting the police involved since your property was vandalized.”
A Final Perspective on the Matter
Another reader commented, “Perhaps install a path at the edge of the creek to direct people a better way. Not required, but it may help soothe hurt feelings.”
Showdown at 40,000 Feet When Passenger Refuses to Move Up Her Reclined Seat in Economy.