Woman Uses Coveted Concert Tickets to Force Her Boyfriend to Quit Smoking, But Public Opinion Takes a Shocking Turn Against Her.
In this emotionally charged tale, the Original Poster (OP) skillfully intertwines the struggles of her boyfriend’s attempt to quit smoking with the tantalizing allure of coveted event tickets. The story crescendos to a pivotal moment where the stakes of quitting become immeasurably high, leaving us on edge, curious about the fate of their tumultuous relationship.
The Yearly Ticket Bonanza
OP annually receives a multitude of tickets to premier stadium events in the United States, a work tradition cloaked in vagueness to maintain her privacy. The tickets offer exceptional seats, from box seats at major sports games to intimate proximity at concerts. The privilege of these experiences is exclusively hers.
The Boyfriend’s Challenge
OP’s boyfriend harbors a smoking habit he wishes to discard. Seeing an opportunity, OP proposes a motivating challenge: if he quits smoking, they will celebrate his success with tickets to a special event. The prospect excites him, and he formulates a plan to quit.
The Stagnant Effort
A month passes, but OP notes no visible progress in her boyfriend’s quest to quit smoking. In a light-hearted threat, she mentions inviting his sister to a Taylor Swift concert instead. The lack of effort in quitting smoking on his part sparks this suggestion.
The Unfair Game
The boyfriend, upon hearing the threat, feels aggrieved, claiming that the tickets and his smoking habit should not be tied together. He argues that OP should invite him to these coveted events out of kindness and shared experience. His discontent surfaces, and he feels cheated by the arrangement.
The Hard Stance
Despite her boyfriend’s protests, OP firmly asserts that the ticket privileges could expand when he manages to quit smoking. Before then, she doesn’t wish to consider his proposal. Her stance upsets him further as he perceives her behavior as manipulative and rude.
The Stubborn Standoff
An impasse is reached, with OP and her boyfriend steadfast in their respective positions. She stands firm, insisting he quit smoking for additional privileges, while he digs in his heels, demanding fair access to the events. Accusations of being an ‘a******’ are thrown around as neither seems willing to relent.
The Unsympathetic Position
As a non-smoker, OP struggles to sympathize with her boyfriend’s predicament. Her lack of understanding of his addiction compounds the issue. This lack of shared experience deepens the divide between them.
The Unfulfilled Promise
A significant revelation comes to light: the boyfriend’s desire to quit smoking is not a recent development. For years, he’s been expressing a want to quit, but progress has been scarce. His hollow promises make OP reconsider their arrangement.
The Public Vote
In an attempt to mediate the situation, OP takes their conflict to an online forum. The public’s opinion, surprisingly, leans towards her being in the wrong. The judgment forces OP to consider the possibility of her actions being unfair.
The Future Uncertain
If the public’s vote continues to find her at fault, it appears the boyfriend’s future will be filled with exciting events. In light of these developments, OP also contemplates a sincere apology. However, the outcome remains uncertain as both parties continue their standoff.
The Unexpected Confrontation
The boyfriend’s sister learns about the situation and confronts OP. She sides with her brother, accusing OP of manipulation and putting undue pressure on him. The situation grows increasingly complicated.
The Unexpected Ally
Surprisingly, one of OP’s close friends sides with her, understanding her motive behind linking the tickets to quitting smoking. She empathizes with OP’s frustration over the boyfriend’s stagnant effort, adding a different perspective to the conflict. Yet, it doesn’t substantially alter the course of events.
The Critical Decision
Despite the mixed opinions and emerging complexities, OP decides to stick with her original plan. She continues to link the tickets to his smoking cessation, hoping it’ll serve as much-needed motivation. She prepares herself for the upcoming confrontation.
Was The Woman’s Behavior Appropriate?
The readers in the forum had a lot of mixed views on the matter. Here are some of their responses:
Forum Responded
One reader said, “You made the terms clear at the beginning, it’s his own fault for starting smoking in the first place, and the longer he carries on, the harder quitting will be. Stick to your guns.”
Another Commenter Thinks
Another responder wrote: “It was clear to him that he got the tickets if he followed your terms and conditions. He didn’t follow your terms and conditions; he didn’t get the tickets.
But the whole ‘if you do this, you get a reward’ reminds me of how you would train a dog.”
A Third View on The Story
A different person states, “You had a clear deal. Giving up smoking isn’t easy (I know, I’ve done it), but it is impossible if you don’t even TRY. I’m sure if he was making an attempt, you’d reconsider, but he isn’t.”
A Final Perspective on the Matter
Another viewpoint on the story: “Sounds like you should have already dumped him. These forum judgments are bizarrely missing the point that he agreed to this arrangement enthusiastically, and you aren’t being manipulative by enforcing smoking being a deal breaker.”
What Do You Think?
What are your thoughts on their actions?
What would you have done in this situation?
More From Top Dollar
More From Top Dollar
More From Top Dollar
More From Top Dollar
In a tumultuous blend of family discord, a man finds himself in the eye of the storm as his wife and daughter clash over a deeply personal issue: a deleted novel. Amidst heated confrontations and allegations, his passive role in the fight becomes the focal point of a dispute that threatens to shatter his family.
More From Top Dollar
A woman’s family is torn apart by a bitter inheritance dispute after the death of her loved one, culminating in an intense legal showdown that threatens to sever the family forever.
